Bullseye window
|
| In the bullseye pictured above, standard headers-on-end have been used, resulting in wide joints at the extrados. Using a special tapered brick would have produced parallel mortar joints. |
A bullseye window is a circular opening in a wall (of any material) that features a window. It may be referred to as a ‘bullseye’ (or ‘bullseyes’ (pl.)) and can be found in brickwork, concrete, stone, metal cladding and other walling types.
Achieving a perfect circle can be difficult, the degree of which will depend on the material. In in-situ- poured concrete, the shape will be determined by the accuracy of the formwork. In profiled metal cladding, the circle will have to be cut, sometimes by hand (factory laser-cutting may be easier and more precise).
[edit] Brickwork bullseyes
In brickwork, a bullseye opening can be created by using ‘brick on end’ where the bricks – whether the stretcher or header faces – are laid upright around the opening. Using the stretcher face laid horizontally would normally result in a very unsatisfactory opening aesthetically unless the radii concerned are very large, such as was the case at Louis Kahn’s parliament buildings in Dacca. This is because the short headers (on edge normally) are more able to adapt to the required curvature than the longer stretcher faces which consequently are rarely used for this purpose.
In cavity walls where the brick thickness is 102.5mm, a circular opening can be created by a single- brick circular course; in solid brick walls, particularly when thicker than 215mm, more courses may be used.
[edit] Limitations of the standard brick
|
| The photo above shows widely tapered mortar joints at the extrados which can occur when using standard bricks, in this case, stretchers placed 'on end'. On small radii such as these, tapered bricks may have produced a neater effect. |
Standard bricks may be used for circular openings but if the opening radius is small, the phenomenon of ‘tapering’ of the mortar joints around the circumference occurs. This is where the mortar joint at the top of the brick (extrados) is appreciably wider than that at the inside edge of the opening (intrados). The result can be unsightly, and – if the taper is wide enough at the top end – could result in some bricks at the top of the arch becoming loose.
Aesthetically and structurally, it is considered better for all mortar joints around the opening to have a constant 10mm width so no tapering occurs and all the brick sides are parallel. This can be achieved by using special trapezoidal-shaped bricks where the outer (extrados) edge is wider than the lower (intrados) edge. The downside of this approach is that compared to standard bricks, ‘specials’ can be very expensive.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Reslating an ancient water mill
A rare opportunity to record, study and repair early vernacular roofs.
CIOB Apprentice of the Year 2025/26
Construction apprentice from Lincoln Mia Owen wins this years title.
Insulation solutions with less waste for a circular economy
Rob Firman, Technical and Specification Manager, Polyfoam XPS explains.
Recycled waste plastic in construction
Hierarchy, prevention to disposal, plastic types and approaches.
UK Net Zero Carbon Buildings Standard V1 published
Free-to-access technical standard to enable robust proof of a decarbonising built environment.
Prostate Cancer Awareness Month
Why talking about prostate cancer matters in construction.
The Architectural Technology podcast: Where it's AT
Catch up for free, subscribe and share with your network.
The Association of Consultant Architects recap
A reintroduction and recap of ACA President; Patrick Inglis' Autumn update.
The Home Energy Model and its wrappers
From SAP to HEM, EPC for MEES and FHS assessment wrappers.
Future Homes Standard Essentials launched
Future Homes Hub launches new campaign to help sector prepare for the implementation of new building standards.
Building Safety recap February, 2026
Our regular run-down of key building safety related events of the month.
Planning reform: draft NPPF and industry responses.
Last chance to comment on proposed changes to the NPPF.
A Regency palace of colour and sensation. Book review.




















